Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Barry Schoenborn's avatar

THANKS, KEN! You did it again. A personal experience (dead tree in the middle of the road), leading to a broader study of efficiency. And Starbucks should be a good example.

I'm a longtime fan of time-motion studies by Frederick Winslow Taylor, but they are funnier in the film "Cheaper by the Dozen." And I love appropriate automation. Even a pizza-making robot in Paris looks like fun.

Starbucks, unfortunately, FAILS the "efficiency" test when it keeps costs low by union busting. It's all over the internet. Starbucks interferes, denies, and closes stores. It is NOT correct to gain cost efficiency by damaging people.

Let's look at Patagonia and Chobani, and see if they're doing OK.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts